Carey Nieuwhof has written a great post on Audience Analysis applied to Sermon preparation & delivery:
Too often, people who present material (on any topic, not just spiritual topics) focus on what they have to say, rather than what their audience will hear.
In his post, Carey describes his process to bring those two things closer together.
This is worth review by any preacher or teacher, or even sales rep!
When you have the time, you should do a little research on the history of the doctrine of the Trinity. I’m not going to review the whole history in this post, but it’s useful history to be aware of.
The short version goes back to the First Council of Nicaea, in 325. There were a lot of theological disputes back in those days, so Emperor Constantine pressured the leading bishops of the day to gather and resolve these. One of the issues centered around the nature of Jesus Christ. Ultimately related to that question was which of the writings in circulation at the time, should be considered “sacred.”
As part of the discussion, one guy promulgated what we know call “The Trinity”, God in three persons, but one God.
I don’t have any huge objection to the use of this “paradigm”, but I think we should recognize it is an attempt to explain something about God, which we cannot understand. So, it’s more a statement about our capacity to grasp God, than it is a statement about God.
As you may know, one of the significant objections Muslims have to the way Christians talk about God, is that we have three gods (Father, Son, Spirit), while Muslims have but one God.
I think the Muslims have phrased it more properly.
God has presented himself to us in three different ways. But that has to do with our intellectual capabilities, not the limits of God.
He presented himself as Jesus, to give us a living example of what it means to be the person he wants us to be.
He presents himself as the Spirit, because of his continuing presence and influence in our life, if we are persistent in seeking him.
But God is God. He is sovereign.
We should acknowledge him and him alone, and admit we can’t comprehend everything there is to know about God.
Humility is a good thing.
It took me a couple of months, reading off and on, to get thru this book. It does not qualify as “light” reading material.
Kurzweil is a very smart dude, especially when it comes to applied technology. I’ve known about him for some time, because of his work in speech recognition.
However, the premise of this book is his prediction that by 2026, scientists & engineers will develop the technical capability to duplicate the human mind artificially. He describes how this “project” is developing, and writes extensively about how the human mind works. He even explores the ethical or moral issues of whether we will view this artificial intelligence as sentient or conscious.
I don’t know Kurzweil’s religious beliefs, if any. Clearly, he seems to be a true evolutionist, showing no evidence of any belief of God’s participation in the creation of human kind.
To me, his book raises to another level, the question of what is it about human beings that separates us from animals. Now, I don’t mean this in the obvious ways. Of course, I believe man has a soul, which is something animals do not have. But I also acknowledge our brains likely work much the same way the brain of other animals works. So, what accounts for the difference. And how is that difference explained?
Now, I’m reading another book: The Righteous Mind (by Jonathan Haidt). It has similar implications.
I’m still working on how I can explain both this question and my response.
Have you ever noticed, being a disciple of Jesus is inconvenient?
As a Jesus disciple, our focus is ideally, and continually, on others, seeking to do what is best for them. Figuring out what is best for others takes time and thought. Then actually doing it, may be even more difficult — either in terms of time or effort.
But all of that is inconvenient — but then, it’s not about us, is it?
The point of Christianity is not the perfection with which we live our lives, but rather, the forgiveness, which masks our imperfections.
But the law of loving others could not be discovered by reason, because it is unreasonable / Leo Tolstoy (Anna Karenina)