Archive for October 2008
I don’t want you to misunderstand the point I’m about to make. I agree there is value is discussion about the meaning to the Text. It’s an important part of growing in understanding and maturity of our faith.
But, I also believe there is a limit to such value. Often this limitation becomes even stronger as the vigor of any given position increases. Here’s why:
In an ultimate sense, when we debate/discuss what the Text means, we are debating what the proper doctrine should be. Another way to say that is “we’re debating what is right and what is wrong.” In and of itself, there is nothing wrong with that, but such discussions often lead us to judge the faith of other believers.
And the Text itself says we should not be judging the faith of other believers, only God is their judge.
After all, to condemn someone with whom I disagree on some doctrinal matter is to disregard two things:
- it is tantamount to imposing a new law on someone, when Jesus repeated said he came to do away with Law as an approach to finding righteousness before God.
- by implication, it says what God has forgiven me of is less significant than what he has forgiven you of — which is an absurd position.
The implications of discipleship
Posted 2008/10/03
on:My preoccupation with loving others the way Jesus loved me began many years ago, but it started small and just kept percolating until it boiled over.
Recent Comments