Give Yourself to Others …

Author Archive

I’ve been contemplating the nature of our relationship with God, in the broad context of the Scriptures and our redemption.

It seems to me, much of the Christian world may have missed the substantive point.

I understand the Text (which is the word I prefer to “Bible”) reveals God’s original intent was we should have an eternal relationship with him; but because God gave us the ability to choose or reject that goal, in broad terms, we have rejected it.  That was choice displayed in the account of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden.

We fell victim to the belief, that because we could recognize the difference between Good and Evil, just as God does, then we would be like God.  Well, we were already “like” God; but as is always the case, we thought we could actually be equal with God — which is a whole different matter.

So, God gave us the Law of Moses, to demonstrate to us how little we knew about being equal with God.  In the New Testament text, we’re told the Law was put in place so we would recognize this failure by us to live up to God’s standard.

As a result, and as he always said he would, God put in place a path which leads us back to him.  That path, of course, was the life of Jesus, his death, resurrection and restoration to God — the good news — the gospel.

The choice left for us is whether to fully submit our individual will to the will of God, and devote ourselves to seeking after God in every way, at every moment, every day.

However, even if we are fully devoted, we will fail to achieve that goal, which is the Text states “we are saved by grace” and that’s a gift from God, not something we have earned.  Because if we had to earn it, we would be condemned for all our failures.

The significance of this view is high, especially for those of us raised in modern Western civilization.  For we are taught about our freedom, our individuality, the right to defend ourselves, hold ourselves up, take pride in our accomplishments.  And submission to anyone or anything seems completely counter to our thinking and our way of life.

We are truly unfamiliar with the concept of submission.  We don’t appreciate the idea of Jesus as King or God as Lord — because we have never had anyone or anything with truly life and death power over us.

Thus, we struggle with our pride and self-reliance and self-importance.

And God seeks our submission.

The question for each day is:  How may I submit myself to God today?

And the answer, from the Text, is:  Give yourself to others, for their good, expecting nothing in return.

Advertisements

In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. And from that moment, God has been sovereign over the earth. Then, he created us — in his image and with the free will to make choices consistent with or in conflict with his will.

He revealed his will for us, to us, and we acted as if we heard him, but we really didn’t. He told us if we lived according to his will, we would be with him forever. We started to think and continue, to this day, to think we are smart enough and wise enough to make decisions, without considering what God’s will for us is.

By acting in conflict with God’s will, we should be destined to be separated from God, now and forever.

But how could a loving God, abandon his creation to be separated from himself? Many of us still ask this question today.

However, God did not abandon us. He made a covenant with us.

He would redeem us from our destiny of separation, if we would acknowledge him as absolute Lord and King of our lives and then, just try to live the way he asks us to live.

We even have a hard time with that, don’t we?

To seal this covenant between God and us, Jesus came to earth. God’s only begotten. One and the same with God. Inseparable from God.

Jesus lived as God wants us to live. The complete example of how to conform to the will of God.

And this Jesus, whom we worship, accepted as his own, the blame and responsibility for all of our failures to conform to God’s will. And so, God allowed Jesus to die in your place and in my place, as punishment for our failures.

But then, in a moment of amazing grace and forgiveness, God said, no, you shall not die, Jesus, you shall live forever with me — and God raised Jesus from the dead.

To claim this redeeming grace and forgiveness, God asks us only to surrender everything about ourselves to him. To put ourselves behind everyone. To submit. To acknowledge he is God. To give up our pride and selfishness in favor of what is best for those around us. For, in order to love God, we must love each other the way Jesus loved us and gave his life for us.

This is what we celebrate today — nothing less. And what could be more proper to celebrate. We are children of God, because Jesus died in our place, and God redeemed us.

Carey Nieuwhof has written a great post on Audience Analysis applied to Sermon preparation & delivery:

How To Know What Your Audience Is Thinking BEFORE You Communicate

Too often, people who present material (on any topic, not just spiritual topics) focus on what they have to say, rather than what their audience will hear.

In his post, Carey describes his process to bring those two things closer together.

This is worth review by any preacher or teacher, or even sales rep!

When you have the time, you should do a little research on the history of the doctrine of the Trinity.  I’m not going to review the whole history in this post, but it’s useful history to be aware of.

The short version goes back to the First Council of Nicaea, in 325.  There were a lot of theological disputes back in those days, so Emperor Constantine pressured the leading bishops of the day to gather and resolve these.  One of the issues centered around the nature of Jesus Christ.  Ultimately related to that question was which of the writings in circulation at the time, should be considered “sacred.”

As part of the discussion, one guy promulgated what we know call “The Trinity”, God in three persons, but one God.

I don’t have any huge objection to the use of this “paradigm”, but I think we should recognize it is an attempt to explain something about God, which we cannot understand.  So, it’s more a statement about our capacity to grasp God, than it is a statement about God.

As you may know, one of the significant objections Muslims have to the way Christians talk about God, is that we have three gods (Father, Son, Spirit), while Muslims have but one God.

I think the Muslims have phrased it more properly.

God has presented himself to us in three different ways.  But that has to do with our intellectual capabilities, not the limits of God.

He presented himself as Jesus, to give us a living example of what it means to be the person he wants us to be.

He presents himself as the Spirit, because of his continuing presence and influence in our life, if we are persistent in seeking him.

But God is God.  He is sovereign.

We should acknowledge him and him alone, and admit we can’t comprehend everything there is to know about God.

Humility is a good thing.

It took me a couple of months, reading off and on, to get thru this book.  It does not qualify as “light” reading material.

Kurzweil is a very smart dude, especially when it comes to applied technology.  I’ve known about him for some time, because of his work in speech recognition.

However, the premise of this book is his prediction that by 2026, scientists & engineers will develop the technical capability to duplicate the human mind artificially.  He describes how this “project” is developing, and writes extensively about how the human mind works.  He even explores the ethical or moral issues of whether we will view this artificial intelligence as sentient or conscious.

I don’t know Kurzweil’s religious beliefs, if any.  Clearly, he seems to be a true evolutionist, showing no evidence of any belief of God’s participation in the creation of human kind.

To me, his book raises to another level, the question of what is it about human beings that separates us from animals.  Now, I don’t mean this in the obvious ways.  Of course, I believe man has a soul, which is something animals do not have.  But I also acknowledge our brains likely work much the same way the brain of other animals works.  So, what accounts for the difference.  And how is that difference explained?

Now, I’m reading another book:  The Righteous Mind (by Jonathan Haidt).  It has similar implications.

I’m still working on how I can explain both this question and my response.

 

Have you ever noticed, being a disciple of Jesus is inconvenient?

As a Jesus disciple, our focus is ideally, and continually, on others, seeking to do what is best for them. Figuring out what is best for others takes time and thought. Then actually doing it, may be even more difficult — either in terms of time or effort.

But all of that is inconvenient — but then, it’s not about us, is it?

The point of Christianity is not the perfection with which we live our lives, but rather, the forgiveness, which masks our imperfections.


Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,365 other followers

Twitter Updates

Advertisements